PLANNING COMMISSION
The Planning Commission of Chadds Ford Township met
in the Township Hall on
The meeting was called to
order at
Upon motion and second (Reiter,
There was no public comment
offered.
STONE BROOK I and II
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION – Second Public Review
Applicant Paul McLaughlin briefly reviewed initial plans for the two
subdivision proposals, with the original proposal for Stone Brook II having been
to extend
Mr. McLaughlin suggested that if Planning Commission
members agreed to the changes proposed, he would have the plans revised and
submit same to the Township for review at next month’s Planning Commission
meeting. Mr. Reiter asked if Mr.
McLaughlin plans to ask the Township to take dedication of the road and Mr.
McLaughlin replied that he did.
Mr. Todd questioned what effect the revision would
have on the large trees on the Magness property that had been in question at a
previous meeting. Mr. McLaughlin
replied that the revision moved the roadway away from those trees. Mr. McLaughlin suggested that the road
level should remain close to what it is at the present
time.
Mr. Taylor asked if the changes presented increased
Mr. Reiter’s comfort level with the project. Mr. Reiter stated that they
did.
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Two
Mr. and Mrs. Larry Bray were in attendance and stated
that they were in favor of the proposal.
Kevin Matson asked the applicant if the deed research
has been completed. Mr. McLaughlin
replied that the reason he approached the Magnesses was so that the roadway will
be on that property, thus no need to research easements or ownership of other
areas. Mr. Reiter asked if anything
would affect the gentleman who had been present at a prior meeting objecting to
the project. Mr. McLaughlin stated
that the roadway proposed would not come near that gentleman’s
property.
Mr. Matson asked if the driveway had been changed for
Stone Brook I. Mr. McLaughlin
replied that it had. Mr. Mattson
further asked if the applicant’s engineer has had any trouble addressing those
issues presented in Kelly Engineer’s review letters dated
Mr. Taylor asked if the radius of the proposed
cul-de-sac will be appropriate for fire engines, etc. Mr. McLaughlin said that it had been
checked.
After further questioning by Mr. Taylor, Planning
Commission members agreed that the applicant may proceed with revisions of the
plans per the evening’s discussion.
Planning Commission members discussed whether or not
they had current copies of the Baltimore Pike Feasibility Study as prepared by
Spotts, Stevens and McCoy. Mr.
Taylor will check with Angelika Forndran, PE, and report
back.
There being no further business, the meeting was
adjourned at
Respectfully
submitted,
MARYANN D.
FURLONG
Planning Commission
Secretary